Experimental and analytical evaluation of a gas-liquid energy storage (GLES) prototype / A. Vallati, R. de Lieto Vollaro, P. Ocłoń, J. Taler // Energy [Dokument elektroniczny]. – 2021, Vol. 224, 14 ... więcej

Experimental and analytical evaluation of a gas-liquid energy storage (GLES) prototype / A. Vallati, R. de Lieto Vollaro, P. Ocłoń, J. Taler // Energy [Dokument elektroniczny]. – 2021, Vol. 224, 14 s. : il. (w tym kolor.). – Tryb dostępu: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544221003108. – Oznaczenie ref./art.: 120061. – Bibliogr. 20 poz., Abstr. – doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120061. – e-ISSN 1873-6785

In this paper, a novel gas-liquid compressed air energy storage prototype, installed in the laboratory of DIAEE Department of Sapienza University of Rome, is studied. Similar to the Compressed-Air Energy ... więcej

In this paper, a novel gas-liquid compressed air energy storage prototype, installed in the laboratory of DIAEE Department of Sapienza University of Rome, is studied. Similar to the Compressed-Air Energy Storage (CAES), the Gas-Liquid Energy Storage (GLES) technology is based on gas compression/expansion, where the liquid-piston compression and expansion are utilized. This paper reports on the experimental performance of the first GLES prototype and presents the results from a validated mathematical model. The results show that the proposed system has a high energy efficiency (indicated) over 90%, and then to achieve high values of round trip efficiency (RTE), it is important to improve and optimize the efficiency of the auxiliaries (Motor/Pump and Turbine/Generator). Two different Test, with two different speed of charging phase were done. From the results of the experimental measurements done with the prototype built in the laboratory of the DIAEE Department of Sapienza University of Rome, it can be seen that for slow compression the RTE of the system is around 72%, instead for the fast compression phase, the RTE is around 70%. A mathematical model was implemented and tested with the experimental measurements. From results it can be seen a good agreement between the experimental and numerical analysis, with a maximum error in the Test B (slow compression) equal to 2.5% and 1% respectively for charging and discharging phase. From the parametric analysis it can be seen that only the volume of the tank and the pressure ratio are needed to predict the round trip efficiency of the system.